The Role of Posterior Parietal Brain Regions in Creative Divergent Thinking by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Science. University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 Departman of psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Science. University of of Allameh-Tabatabaei, Tehran, Iran.

3 PhD. in Neuroscience, Cognitive Science Institution, Educational-Researching Institution of Defensive Industries, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Creativity is defined as producing original and valuable ideas. Cognitive and neuroscience studies have investigated nonverbal and neural underpinnings of creativity through transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). In the current experiment the study included 40 students of faculty of psychology from the University of Tehran. Participants were randomly assigned to either experimental or sham groups by accessible sampling. Descriptive statistical analysis like frequency, frequency percentage, average, standard deviation, variance, Pierson correlation and inferential statistic like variance analysis of multiple variables were conducted. The results show that left cathode-right anodal tDCS stimulation of posterior parietal cortex (PPC; P3-P4 based on 10-20 international system) had a significant effect on within and between subject scores of FPT in the experimental group in comparison with the sham group. Findings of current study imply that PPC has a role in neural underpinnings and enhancement of creativity.

Keywords

References

Abraham, A., Pieritz, K., Thybusch, K., Rutter, B., Kröger, S., Schweckendiek, J., Stark, R., Windmann, S. and Hermann, C., (2012). Creativity and the brain: uncovering the neural signature of conceptualexpansion. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1906-1917.
Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2017). Latency predicts category switch in divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 43-49.
Behrmann, M., Geng, J. J., & Shomstein, S. (2004). Parietal cortex and attention. Current opinion in neurobiology, 14(2), 212-217.
Curtis, C. E. (2006). Prefrontal and parietal contributions to spatial working memory. Neuroscience, 139(1), 173-180.
Cerruti, C., & Schlaug, G. (2009). Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex enhances complex verbal associative thought. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,21(10), 1980–1987.
Chi, R. P., & Snyder, A. W. (2012). Brain stimulation enables the solution of an inherently difficult problem. Neuroscience Letters, 515(2), 121–124.
Colombo, B., Bartesaghi, N., Simonelli, L., &Antonietti, A. (2015). The combined effects of neurostimulation and priming on creative thinking.A preliminary tDCS study on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 9, 403-412.
Chrysikou, E. G., Hamilton, R. H., Coslett, H. B., Datta, A., Bikson, M., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2013). Noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation over the left prefrontal cortex facilitates cognitive flexibility in tool use. Cognitive neuroscience, 4(2), 81-89.
De Souza, L.C., Volle, E., Bertoux, M., Czernecki, V., Funkiewiez, A., Allali, G., Leroy, B., Sarazin, M., Habert, M.O., Dubois, B. and Kas, A., (2010). Poor creativity in frontotemporal dementia: a window into the neural bases of the creative mind. Neuropsychologia, 48(13), 3733-3742.
Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 11(6), 1011-1026.
Dietrich, A., &Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological bulletin, 136(5), 822-848.
Forthmann, B., Wilken, A., Doebler, P., &Holling, H. (2016). Strategy induction enhances creativity in figural divergent thinking. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 79-89.
Fink, A., Grabner, R. H., Benedek, M., Reishofer, G., Hauswirth, V., Fally, M., Neuper, C., Ebner, F., & Neubauer, A. C. (2009). The creative brain: investigation of brain activity during creative problem solving by means of EEG and FMRI. Human brain mapping, 30(3), 734–748.
Goel, V., Eimontaite, I., Goel, A., & Schindler, I. (2015). Differential modulation of performance in insight and divergent thinking tasks with tDCS. The Journal of Problem Solving, 8(1), 2-12.
Goebel, S., Fischer, R., Ferstl, R., & Mehdorn, H. M. (2009). Normative data and psychometric properties for qualitative and quantitative scoring criteria of the Five-point Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(4), 675-690.
Guliford .J.P. (2005).The nature of human intelligence. McGrahill. New York NY.
Green, A. E., Spiegel, K. A., Giangrande, E. J., Weinberger, A. B., Gallagher, N. M., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2017). Thinking cap plus thinking zap: tDCS of frontopolar cortex improves creative analogical reasoning and facilitates conscious augmentation of state creativity in verb generation. Cerebral Cortex, 27(4), 2628-2639.
Ghanavati, E., Nejati, V., &Salehinejad, M. A. (2018). Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Posterior Parietal Cortex (PPC) Enhances Figural Fluency: Implications for Creative Cognition. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 2(1), 88-96.
Husain, M., & Nachev, P. (2007). Space and the parietal cortex. Trends in cognitive sciences, 11(1), 30-36.
Lee, G. P., Strauss, E., Loring, D. W., McCloskey, L., Haworth, J. M., & Lehman, R. A. (1997). Sensitivity of figural fluency on the five-point test to focal neurological dysfunction. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11(1), 59-68.
Mihalyi, C. (1996). Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovering and Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Perennial.
Mayseless, N., &Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2015). Enhancing verbal creativity: modulating creativity by altering the balance between right and left inferior frontal gyrus with tDCS. Neuroscience, 291, 167-176.
Nitsche, M. A., Cohen, L. G., Wassermann, E. M., Priori, A., Lang, N., Antal, A., Paulus, W., Hummel, F., Boggio, P. S., Fregni, F., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2008). Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain stimulation, 1(3), 206–223.
Priori, A., Mameli, F., Cogiamanian, F., Marceglia, S.A.R.A., Tiriticco, M., Mrakic-Sposta, S., Ferrucci, R., Zago, S., Polezzi, D. and Sartori, G., (2007). Lie-specific involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception. Cerebral Cortex, 18(2), 451-455.
Regard, M., Strauss, E., & Knapp, P. (1982). Children's production on verbal and non-verbal fluency tasks. Perceptual and motor skills, 55(3), 839-844.
Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Ablex Publishing.
Ruff, R. M., Light, R. H., & Evans, R. W. (1987). The Ruff Figural Fluency Test: a normative study with adults. Developmental neuropsychology, 3(1), 37-51.
Ruggiero, F., Lavazza, A., Vergari, M., Priori, A., &Ferrucci, R. (2018). Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Left Temporal Lobe Modulates Insight. Creativity Research Journal, 30(2), 143-151.
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Adler, N., Aharon-Peretz, J., Perry, D., & Mayseless, N. (2011). The origins of originality: the neural bases of creative thinking and originality. Neuropsychologia, 49(2), 178-185.
Sternberg.R.J. (2009).A three facet mode of creativity. the nature of creativity. cambriage university press. text Reading improvement. Cholas Vista, 43(1): 13-17.
Szczepanski, S. M., & Knight, R. T. (2014). Insights into human behavior from lesions to the prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 83(5), 1002-1018.
Torrance ,E.P .(1979) . An instructional model for enhancing incubation. Journal of Creative Behavior, 13(1): 23-35.
Tucha, L., Aschenbrenner, S., Koerts, J., & Lange, K. W. (2012). The Five-Point Test: Reliability, validity and normative data for children and adults. PloS one, 7(9), 45-54.
Weinberger, A. B., Green, A. E., &Chrysikou, E. G. (2017). Using transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance creative cognition: interactions between task, polarity, and stimulation site. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 11, 246-253.
Zmigrod, S., Colzato, L. S., & Hommel, B. (2015). Stimulating creativity: modulation of convergent and divergent thinking by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 353-360.
 
 
 
 
 
Journal of Applied Psychological Research
Volume 11, Issue 2
August 2020
Pages 209-224

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics