تعیین ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی و تغییرناپذیری اندازه‌گیری مقیاس فابینگ شریک

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد مشاوره خانواده، گروه مشاوره، دانشکدۀ روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی ، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه برنامه‌ریزی درسی، دانشکدۀ روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.

3 دانشجوی دکتری رشته مشاوره، گروه مشاوره، دانشکدۀ روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.

4 کارشناسی ارشد سنجش و اندازه‌گیری، گروه سنجش و اندازه‌گیری، دانشکدۀ روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر، مطالعۀ ساختار عاملی مقیاس فابینگ شریک[1]، قابلیت انطباق‌پذیری و تغییرناپذیری آن در جامعۀ ایران بود. روش پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی، از لحاظ گردآوری داده توصیفی-پیمایشی و براساس تحلیل داده همبستگی بود. جامعۀ آماری این مطالعه تمام معلمان متأهل استان زنجان در سال 1401 بود. تعداد نمونه به 841 نفر رسید که از این تعداد 481 نفر زن و 238 نفر مرد بودند و 122 نفر هم جنسیتشان را اعلام نکرده بودند. ابزار اصلی پژوهش مقیاس فابینگ شریک بود. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از شاخص‌های آمار توصیفی، ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و تحلیل‌عاملی اکتشافی و تأییدی استفاده شد. تحلیل داده‌ها با نرم‌افزارهای SPSS-26، بستۀ لاوان و بستۀ EGAnet در نرم‌افزار R انجام شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد مقیاس فابینگ شریک ساختار تک‌عاملی دارد. تمامی گویه‌ها به‌غیر از گویۀ 7 با مدل پاسخ مدرج برازش قابل‌قبول داشتند. شاخص‌های برازش مطلوب و قابل‌قبول بودند. برون‌دادها حکایت از پایایی مناسب این مقیاس داشت. با اینکه روایی تشخیصی ابزار پایین بود، در سطح سازه برقرار بود. تغییرناپذیری جنسیتی برای این ابزار تأیید شد. بار عاملی تمام گویه‌ها به‌جز گویۀ 7 معنادار بودند. همچنین مقیاس فابینگ شریک، روایی همگرا و واگرای مطلوبی نشان داد. نتایج گویای این بود که مقیاس فابینگ شریک از ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی مطلوب جهت کاربرد در پژوهش‌های آتی برخوردار است. البته پژوهش‌های آتی باید روایی تشخیصی ابزار و شاخص‌های روان‌سنجی گویۀ 7 این مقیاس را در بین نمونه‌های مختلف با خصایص جمعیت‌شناختی و فرهنگی متفاوت مورد بازبینی قرار دهند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Determining the Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance of the Partner Phubbing Scale

نویسندگان [English]

  • Manouchehr Rezaee 1
  • Balal Izanloo 2
  • Naser Abbasi 3
  • Habibeh Bashirnezhad Dastjerdi 4
1 Department of Counseling, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Curriculum Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Department of Counseling, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
4 Department of Assessment and Measurement, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The aim of the current research was to study the adaptability and invariance of the Partner Phubbing Scale in Iranian society, as well as its factor structure. The current research method was implemented in terms of the purpose and descriptive-survey in terms of data acquisition, as well as correlational analysis process. The statistical population of this research consisted of all married teachers in Zanjan province in 2022. The total number of participants was 841. Of these, 481 were female, 238 were male, and 122 had not designated their gender. The Partner Phubbing scale was the primary instrument utilized in this investigation.Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, descriptive statistics indicators, and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the dataset. The Lavaan package, EGAnet package, and SPSS26 software were employed to conduct the data analysis in R software. The findings showed that the Partner Phubbing Scale had a single-factor structure. With the exception of item 7, all items demonstrated a satisfactory fit with the graded response model. The fit indices were satisfactory and appropriate. The outputs indicated that this scale had proper reliability. Although the tool’s discriminant validity was minimal; however, it was preserved at the construct level. This measure was verified to be gender-invariant. All items, with the exception of item 7, exhibited significant factor loading. Additionally, this scale exhibited appropriate divergent and convergent validity. The Partner Phubbing Scale exhibited optimized psychometric properties for future research research applications, as indicated by the results. Yet, future research should evaluate the discriminant validity of this tool and the psychometric indices of item 7 in various samples with different demographic and cultural characteristics.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Phubbing
  • Couple Relationship
  • Item-Response Theory
  • Exploratory Graph Analysis
  • Invariance

مراجع

ایزانلو، ب.، رضائی، م.، و عباسی، ن. (1402). تعیین ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی و تغییرناپذیری اندازه‏ گیری مقیاس پاسخگویی و عدم حساسیت ادراک. فصلنامه اندازه گیری تربیتی، 13(51)، 6-44. https://doi.org/10.22054/jem.2023.70151.3401
رضائی، م.، ایزانلو، ب.، عباسی، ن.، و بشیرنژاد، ح. (1402). .تعیین ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی و تغییرناپذیری   اندازه‌گیری مقیاس شکوفایی زوجی. پژوهش‌های روانشناختی، 1(24)، 223-188. http://www.psychological-research.com/Article/44338
References
Ahlstrom, M., Lundberg, N. R., Zabriskie, R., Eggett, D., & Lindsay, G. B. (2012). Me, my spouse, and my avatar: The relationship between marital satisfaction and playing massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPGs). Journal of Leisure Research, 44(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2012.11950252
Beukeboom, C. J., & Pollmann, M. (2021). Partner phubbing: Why using your phone during interactions with your partner can be detrimental for your relationship. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106932
Bröning, S., & Wartberg, L. (2022). Attached to your smartphone? A dyadic perspective on perceived partner phubbing and attachment in long-term couple relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 126, 106996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106996
Capilla Garrido, E., Issa, T., Gutiérrez Esteban, P., & Cubo Delgado, S. (2021). A descriptive literature review of phubbing behaviors. Heliyon, 7(5), e07037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07037
Chalmers, R. P. (2012). Mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the r environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(6), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i06
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). The effects of “phubbing” on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(6), 304–316. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/jasp.12506
Çizmeci, E. (2017). Disconnected, though satisfied: Phubbing behavior and relationship satisfaction. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 7(2), 364-375. https://doi.org/10.7456/10702100/018
Crasta, D., Rogge, R. D., Maniaci, M. R., & Reis, H. T. (2021). Toward an optimized measure of perceived partner responsiveness: Development and validation of the perceived responsiveness and insensitivity scale. Psychological Assessment, 33(4), 338-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pas0000986
Davey, S., Davey, A., Raghav, S. K., Singh, J. V., Singh, N., Blachnio, A., & Przepiórkaa, A. (2018). Predictors and consequences of "Phubbing" among adolescents and youth in India: An impact evaluation study. Journal of Family & Community Medicine, 25(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfcm.JFCM_71_17
David, M. E., & Roberts, J. A. (2020). Developing and testing a scale designed to measure perceived phubbing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8152. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218152
Dilonardo, M. J. (2018). Are you guilty of phubbing? Some people just can’t put down their phones. https://www.mnn.com/lifestyle/arts-culture/stories/are-you-guilty-phubbing
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Frackowiak, M., Hilpert, P., & Russell, P. S. (2022). Partner's perception of phubbing is more relevant than the behavior itself: A daily diary study. Computers in Human Behavior, 134, 107323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107323
Gable, S. L., Impett, E. A., Reis, H. T., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228
Golino, H., & Christensen, A. P. (2022). EGAnet: Exploratory Graph Analysis – A framework for estimating the number of dimensions in multivariate data using network psychometrics. R Package Version 0.9, 5. [Link]
Haigh, A. (2015). Stop phubbing. Online Article. Retrievable at http://stopphubbing.com
Halpern, D., & Katz, J. E. (2017). Texting's consequences for romantic relationships: A cross-lagged analysis highlights its risks. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.051
Izanloo, B., Rezaee, M., & Abbasi, N. (2023). Determining the psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the perceived responsiveness and insensitivity scale. Educational Measurement, 13(51). https://doi.org/10.22054/jem.2023.70151.3401
Khodabakhsh, S., & Le Ong, Y. (2021). The impact of partner phubbing on marital quality among married couples in Malaysia: moderating effect of gender and age. Aloma: Revista de Psicologia, Ciències de L'educació i de L'esport Blanquerna, 39(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.51698/aloma.2021.39.1.9-16
Kimmes, J. G., Jaurequi, M. E., May, R. W., Srivastava, S., & Fincham, F. D. (2018). Mindfulness in the context of romantic relationships: Initial development and validation of the Relationship Mindfulness Measure. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 44(4), 575-589. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12296
Liu, J., Wang, W., Hu, Q., Wang, P., Lei, L., & Jiang, S. (2021). The relationship between phubbing and the depression of primary and secondary school teachers: A moderated mediation model of rumination and job burnout. Journal of Affective Disorders, 295, 498-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.070
McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000065
McDaniel, B. T., & Wesselmann, E. (2021). “You phubbed me for that?” Reason given for phubbing and perceptions of interactional quality and exclusion. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(3), 413-422.https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.255
McDaniel, B. T., Galovan, A. M., & Drouin, M. (2021). Daily technoference, technology use during couple leisure time, and relationship quality. Media Psychology, 24(5), 637-665. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1783561
Moreau, Q., Galvan, L., Nazir, T. A., & Paulignan, Y. (2016). Dynamics of social interaction: Kinematic analysis of a joint action. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02016
Musa, I. A., Gani, E., Abdulkareem, A., Aliyu, A., & Khali, A. (2021) Phubbing: Towards a theory of Techno-Snubbing in the Context of Non-western Culture. [Link]
Parmaksiz, İ. (2021). Relationships between phubbing and the five factor personality traits. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 29(4), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.795620
R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/index.html
Rezaee, M., Izanloo, B., Abbasi, N., & Habibeh, B. D. (2023). Determining the psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the couple flourishing measure. Psychological Research, 24(1), 188-223. http://www.psychological-research.com/Article/44338 (
Ríos Ariza, J. M., Matas-Terrón, A., Rumiche Chávarry, R. D. P., & Chunga Chinguel, G. R. (2021). Scale for Measuring Phubbing in Peruvian University Students: Adaptation, Validation and Results of Its Application. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(2), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.7.606
Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Russell, C. A., Norman, A. T., & Heckler, S. E. (2004). The consumption of television programming: development and validation of the connectedness scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 150-161.
Sanri, Ç., Halford, W. K., Rogge, R. D., & von Hippel, W. (2021). The couple flourishing measure. Family Process, 60(2), 457-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12632
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2015). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. psychology press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315749105
Skellern, S. K., Sanri, C., Iqbal, S., Ayub, N., Jarukasemthawee, S., Pisitsungkagarn, K., & Halford, W. K. (2022). Assessment of the Perceived Importance of Religion in Couple Relationships in Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, and the Nonreligious. Family Process, 61(1), 326-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12669
Sun, J., & Samp, J. A. (2022). ‘Phubbing is happening to you’: examining predictors and effects of phubbing behaviour in friendships. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(12), 2691-2704. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1943711
Tolmacz, R., Lev-Ari, L., & Bachner-Melman, R. (2021). Refining the assessment of entitlement in romantic relationships: the sense of relational entitlement scale—revised (SRE-R). Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 744618. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.744618
Vanden Abeele, M., & Mariek, M. P. (2021). Digital wellbeing as a dynamic construct. Communication Theory, 31(4), 932-955. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa024
Vanden Abeele, M. M. P. (2020). The social consequences of phubbing: A framework and a research agenda. In R. Ling, L. Fortunati, G. Goggin, S. S. Lim, & Y. Li (Eds.), The oxford handbook of mobile communication and society (pp. 157–174). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190864385.013.11.
Vanden Abeele, M. M. P., & Postma-Nilsenova, M. (2018). More than just gaze: An experimental vignette study examining how phone-gazing and newspaper-gazing and phubbing-while-speaking and phubbing-while-listening compare in their effect on affiliation. Communication Research Reports, 35(4), 303–313. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/08824096.2018.1492911
Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 119-134. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4
Wang, X., Xie, X., Wang, Y., Wang, P., & Lei, L. (2017). Partner phubbing and depression among married Chinese adults: The roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.014
Wang, X., Zhao, F., & Lei, L. (2021). Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction: Self-esteem and marital status as moderators. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 40(7), 3365–3375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00275-0
Whitton, S. W., & Kuryluk, A. D. (2012). Relationship satisfaction and depressive symptoms in emerging adults: cross-sectional associations and moderating effects of relationship characteristics. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(2), 226. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0027267
Xi, J., & Lee, M. T. (2021). Inner peace as a contribution to human flourishing: A new scale developed from ancient wisdom. In M. T. Lee, L. D. Kubzansky, & T. J. VanderWeele (Eds.), Measuring well-being: Interdisciplinary perspectives from the social sciences and the humanities (pp. 435–481). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197512531.003.0016
 
فصل‌نامه پژوهش‌های کاربردی روانشناختی
دوره 15، شماره 2
1403
صفحه 271-293

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 09 مهر 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 01 دی 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 05 بهمن 1401
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 11 آذر 1402
  • تاریخ انتشار: 01 تیر 1403

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار