ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی نسخۀ فارسی پرسشنامۀ ارتکاب مزاحمت اینترنتی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد روان‌شناسی عمومی، گروه روا‌‌ن‌شناسی، دانشکدۀ روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار، گروه روا‌‌ن‌شناسی، دانشکدۀ روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

3 کارشناسی ارشد روان‌شناسی بالینی، گروه روا‌‌ن‌شناسی، دانشکدۀ علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.

4 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی عمومی، گروه روان‌شناسی بالینی، دانشکدۀ روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

5 کارشناسی ارشد روان‌شناسی عمومی، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه پیام نور عسلویه‌، شیراز، ایران.

6 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد روا‌‌ن‌شناسی بالینی، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده اقتصاد و مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شیراز، شیراز، ایران.

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی نسخۀ فارسی پرسشنامۀ ارتکاب مزاحمت اینترنتی شامل پایایی، روایی، تحلیل‌عاملی تأییدی و تفاوت‌های جنسیتی در میان جوانان انجام شد. پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی، از حیث نوع گردآوری اطلاعات پیمایشی و از نظر روش‌شناسی از جمله مطالعات آزمون‌سازی بود که براساس روش‌ها و اصول رایج در روان‌سنجی در قالب یک طرح پژوهشی همبستگی در سال 1401 انجام گرفت. جامعۀ آماری پژوهش شامل جوانان 18 تا 35 سالۀ ساکن تهران و شیراز بود که از میان آنان، 474 نفر از جوانان به‌صورت نمونه‌گیری دردسترس انتخاب شدند و پرسشنامۀ خودگزارشی ارتکاب مزاحمت اینترنتی (CPQ) را تکمیل کردند. تحلیل داده‌ها به روش ضریب آلفای کرونباخ، ضریب همبستگی پیرسون، تحلیل‌عاملی تأییدی و تی‌تست مستقل به‌وسیلۀ نرم‌افزار SPSS و AMOS نسخۀ 26 در سطح معنی‌داری 05/0 انجام شد. نتایج تحلیل‌عامل تأییدی از ساختار یک‌عاملی حمایت کرد و شاخص‌های برازش مطلوب بود (058/0RMSEA=؛ 109/0PCLOSE=؛ 949/0CFI=؛ 950/0IFI=؛ 953/0GFI=؛ 613/2X2/df=). ضریب آلفای کرونباخ پرسشنامۀ ارتکاب مزاحمت اینترنتی 85/0 و ضریب پایایی بازآزمایی 67/0 به‌دست آمد. میانگین ارتکاب مزاحمت اینترنتی در زنان و مردان تفاوت معنی‌دار داشت (001/0p<؛ 91/3=t). درنتیجه پرسشنامۀ ارتکاب مزاحمت اینترنتی برای سنجش مزاحمت اینترنتی از ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی مناسبی در جوانان برخوردار است.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Psychometric Properties of the Persian Versions of the Cyberbullying Perpetration Questionnaire

نویسندگان [English]

  • Milad Sharafi Zadegan 1
  • Manijeh Firoozi 2
  • Atefeh Fattahi 3
  • Sara Aleyasin 4
  • Arezoo Soltan-Mohammadi 5
  • Zahra Naderi 6
1 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
3 3. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Shiraz, Shiraz, Iran
4 Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Allameh Tabataba'i, Tehran, Iran.
5 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Payam noor University of Asaluye, Shiraz, Iran.
6 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Economics and Management, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch, Shiraz, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The psychometric properties of the Persian version of the cyberbullying perpetration questionnaire were assessed in this study, which included reliability, validity, confirmatory factorial analysis, and gender differences in youth. This is a correlational research design that adheres to the common principles and techniques of psychometrics. It is an applied survey study that was conducted in 2022 and is based on a test construction methodology. 474 participants were selected from the statistical population, which consisted of young individuals aged 18 to 35 residing in Tehran and Shiraz, using convenience sampling. The cyberbullying Perpetration Questionnaire (CPQ) was translated in four stages. Using Cronbach’s alpha, Pearson correlation coefficient, confirmatory factorial analysis, and independent-samples t-tests at a significance level of 0.05, the collected data were analyzed in SPSS and AMOS software version 26. A one-factor model with fit indexes that were favorable (X2/df= 2.613, GFI= 0.953, IFI= 0.950, CFI= 0.949, PCLOSE= 0.109, RMSEA= 0.058) was supported by the confirmatory factorial analysis. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the cyberbullying Perpetration Questionnaire was 0.85, and test-retest reliability was 0.67. The perpetration of cyberbullying was significantly different between males and females (t=3.91, p<0.001). The cyberbullying Perpetration Questionnaire exhibited favorable psychometric properties for the purpose of assessing the perpetration of cyberbullying in young individuals.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Confirmatory Factorial Analysis
  • Cyberbullying
  • Psychometrics
  • Reliability
  • Validity

مراجع

اسماعیلی‌پور، ف.، هاشمی، ت.، و بدری گرگری، رحیم. (1397). نقش سبک‌های فرزندپروری ادراک‌شده و اختلال شخصیت مرزی در قلدری سایبری: نقش میانجی همدلی. مجلۀ روان‌شناسی و روان‌پزشکی شناخت. 5(2)، 92-81. https://shenakht.muk.ac.ir/article-1-329-fa.html
قدم‌پور، ع.، شفیعی، م.، و حیدری‌راد، ح. (1396). بررسی رابطۀ مزاحمت‌های سایبری با آسیب‌پذیری روانی و افکار خودکشی در دانشجویان دختر و پسر. پژوهش در سلامت روان‌شناختی. 11(۳)، 40-28. https://rph.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3040-fa.html
حضرت‌بگی، ف.، عسگری، پ.، مکوندی، ب.، و کرایی، ا. (1401). روابط ساختاری مهارت‌های حل مسئله و هوش معنوی با گرایش به اعتیاد به اینترنت به توجه نقش میانجی نشخوار فکری. مجلۀ علوم روان‌شناختی. 21(114)، 1264-1251. https://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-1307-fa.html
References
Abeele, M. Vanden, & De Cock, R. (2013). Cyberbullying by mobile phone among adolescents: The role of gender and peer group status. Communications, 38(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2013-0006
Aizenkot, D. (2020). Social networking and online self-disclosure as predictors of cyberbullying victimization among children and youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105695
Aricak, T., Siyahhan, S., Uzunhasanoglu, A., Saribeyoglu, S., Ciplak, S., Yilmaz, N., & Memmedov, C. (2008). Cyberbullying among Turkish adolescents. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(3), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0016  0-گزاریتی داشته باشند، به همتا
Calvete, E., Orue, I., Estévez, A., Villardón, L., & Padilla, P. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1128–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.017
Chun, J. S., Lee, J., Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2020). An international systematic review of cyberbullying measurements. In Computers in Human Behavior, 113, 106485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106485
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Cuadrado-Gordillo, I., & Fernández-Antelo, I. (2020). Connectivity as a mediating mechanism in the cybervictimization process. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124567
Dilmac, B. (2009). Psychological needs as a predictor of cyber bullying: A preliminary report on college students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 9(3), 1307–1325. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ858926.pdf
Durán Segura, M., & Martínez Pecino, R. (2015). Ciberacoso mediante teléfono móvil e Internet en las relaciones de noviazgo entre jóvenes. Comunicar, XXII(44), 159–167. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4904498
Esmaeilpour, F., Hashemi, T., & Badri, R. (2018). The role of perceived parenting styles and borderline personality disorder in cyberbullying: mediate empathy. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry, 5(2), 81-92. http://shenakht.muk.ac.ir/article-1-329-en.html (In Persian)
Fanti, K. A., Demetriou, A. G., & Hawa, V. V. (2012). A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining risk and protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.643169
Ghadampour, E., Shafiei, M., & Heidarirad, H. Relationships among Cyberbullying, psychological vulnerability and suicidal thoughts in female and male students. Journal of Research in Psychological Health, 11(3), 28-40. https://rph.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3040-en.html (In Persian)
Grigg, D. W. (2010). Cyber-aggression: Definition and concept of cyberbullying. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 20(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajgc.20.2.143
Hamilton, J., Purdy, N., Willems, R. A., Smith, P. K., Culbert, C., Brighi, A., ... & Völlink, T. (2020). Using the quality circle approach to empower disadvantaged youth in addressing cyberbullying: an exploration across five European countries. Pastoral Care in Education, 38(3), 254–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2020.1788127
Hazratbegi, F., Asgari, P., Makvandi, B., & Koraei, A. (2022). The structural relationships of problem solving skills and spiritual intelligence with internet addiction tendency according mediating role of rumination. Journal of Psychological Science, 21(114), 1251-1264. http://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-1307-en.html (In Persian)
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2010.494133
Hood, M., & Duffy, A. L. (2018). Understanding the relationship between cyber-victimisation and cyber-bullying on Social Network Sites: The role of moderating factors. Personality and Individual Differences, 133, 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.004
Kaluarachchi, C., Warren, M., & Jiang, F. (2020). Responsible use of technology to combat cyberbullying among young people. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 24, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v24i0.2791
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th Ed.). New York: The Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Principles-and-Practice-of-Structural-Equation-Modeling/Rex-Kline/9781462551910
Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S22–S30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618
Kwan, I., Dickson, K., Richardson, M., MacDowall, W., Burchett, H., Stansfield, C., ... & Thomas, J. (2020). Cyberbullying and children and young people’s mental health: A systematic map of systematic reviews. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0370
Lee, J., Abell, N., & Holmes, J. L. (2017). Validation of measures of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization in emerging adulthood. Research on Social Work Practice, 27(4), 456-467. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731515578535
López-Vizcaíno, M. F., Nóvoa, F. J., Carneiro, V., & Cacheda, F. (2021). Early detection of cyberbullying on social media networks. Future Generation Computer Systems, 118(2), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.01.006
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2016). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation (3rd Ed.). Washington DC: Sage publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/applied-multivariate-research/book246895#description
Mishna, F., Cook, C., Saini, M., Wu, M. J., & MacFadden, R. (2011). Interventions to prevent and reduce cyber abuse of youth: A systematic review. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731509351988
Palladino, B. E., Nocentini, A., & Menesini, E. (2015). Psychometric properties of the Florence cyberbullying-cybervictimization scales. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(2), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0366
Parris, L., Lannin, D. G., Hynes, K., & Yazedjian, A. (2020). Exploring Social Media Rumination: Associations With Bullying, Cyberbullying, and Distress. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(5-6), NP3041-NP3061. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520946826
Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 36(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20336
Raskauskas, J., & Stoltz, A. D. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 564-475. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.564
Rivers, I., & Noret, N. (2010). ‘I h8 u’: findings from a five‐year study of text and email bullying. British Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 643–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920903071918
Savoldi, F., & Ferraz de Abreu, P. (2016). Bullying, cyberbullying and Internet usage among young people in post-conflict Belfast. Cogent Social Sciences, 2(1), 1132985. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2015.1132985
Slonje, R., & Smith, P. K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00611.x
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
Sun, S., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2016). Cyberbullying Perpetration: A Meta-Analysis of Gender Differences. International Journal of Internet Science, 11(1), 61–81. https://repository.um.edu.mo/handle
Wang, P., Wang, X., & Lei, L. (2019). Gender differences between student–student relationship and cyberbullying perpetration: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(19-20), 9187–9207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519865970
Wang, X., Lei, L., Liu, D., & Hu, H. (2016). Moderating effects of moral reasoning and gender on the relation between moral disengagement and cyberbullying in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.056
Wang, X., Wang, W., Qiao, Y., Gao, L., Yang, J., & Wang, P. (2020). Parental phubbing and adolescents’ cyberbullying perpetration: A moderated mediation model of moral disengagement and online disinhibition. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(7-8), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520961877
Wang, X., Yang, L., Yang, J., Wang, P., & Lei, L. (2017). Trait anger and cyberbullying among young adults: A moderated mediation model of moral disengagement and moral identity. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 519–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.073
Wright, M. F., & Li, Y. (2013). Normative beliefs about aggression and cyber aggression among young adults: A longitudinal investigation. Aggressive Behavior, 39(3), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21470
Wright, M. F., Huang, Z., Wachs, S., Aoyama, I., Kamble, S., Soudi, S., Li, Z., Lei, L., & Shu, C. (2020). Associations between cyberbullying perpetration and the dark triad of personality traits: the moderating effect of country of origin and gender. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 30(3), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2020.1788979
Wright, M. F., Schiamberg, L. B., Wachs, S., Huang, Z., Kamble, S. V., Soudi, S., ... & Shu, C. (2021). The influence of sex and culture on the longitudinal associations of peer attachment, social preference goals, and adolescents’ cyberbullying involvement: An ecological perspective. School Mental Health, 13(3), 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-021-09438-6
Wright, M. F., Wachs, S., & Harper, B. D. (2018). The moderation of empathy in the longitudinal association between witnessing cyberbullying, depression, and anxiety. Cyberpsychology, 12(4), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2018-4-6
Ybarra, M. L., Boyd, D., Korchmaros, J. D., & Oppenheim, J. K. (2012). Defining and measuring cyberbullying within the larger context of bullying victimization. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(1), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.031
فصل‌نامه پژوهش‌های کاربردی روانشناختی
دوره 15، شماره 2
1403
صفحه 61-75

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 11 مرداد 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 08 مهر 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 17 مهر 1402
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 19 آذر 1402
  • تاریخ انتشار: 01 تیر 1403

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار