ساخت پرسشنامۀ سوگیری‌های تفسیر تیپ شخصیتی دی و ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی آن

موسوی, سیده زهرا; پاکیزه, علی; رجبی, سوران; ریس, کری جان

doi:10.22059/japr.2024.362857.644692

ساخت پرسشنامۀ سوگیری‌های تفسیر تیپ شخصیتی دی و ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی آن

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

سیده زهرا موسوی ¹

علی پاکیزه ²

سوران رجبی ¹

کری جان ریس ³

¹ گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه خلیج فارس، بوشهر، ایران.

² دانشیار، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه خلیج فارس، بوشهر، ایران.

³ گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکدۀ علوم اجتماعی و طبیعی، دانشگاه گلوسسترشایر، چلتنهام، انگلیس.

10.22059/japr.2024.362857.644692

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر ساخت پرسشنامۀ سوگیری تفسیر تیپ شخصیتی دی و تعیین ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی آن در میان دانشجویان بود. پژوهش طی پارادایم اثبات‌گرایی از طریق رویکرد کمی با استفاده از تحلیل‌عاملی اکتشافی و تأییدی انجام گرفت. جامعۀ هدف، دانشجویان دانشگاه خلیج‌فارس بوشهر بودند که 277 نفر از آن‌ها در آذر تا بهمن ۱۴۰۱ به روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی خوشه‌ای انتخاب شدند (۱۵۷ زن و ۱۱۸ مرد). به‌منظور سنجش متغیرها از سه پرسشنامۀ تیپ شخصیتی دی (DS-14)، سلامت روان‌شناختی مقیاس شکوفایی (FS) و سوگیری‌های تفسیر تیپ شخصیتی دی (DIB) استفاده شد. تحلیل‌عاملی اکتشافی با استفاده از SPSS-26 و تحلیل‌عاملی تأییدی با استفاده از AMOS-24 انجام گرفت. براساس تحلیل اکتشافی، ۱۱ مؤلفه با ارزش ویژۀ بالاتر از 1 به‌دست آمد. هریک از مؤلفه‌ها تعدادی آیتم را دربرگرفت که بار عاملی بالاتر از 5/0 داشتند. پایایی گاتمن و روایی همگرا و واگرای پرسشنامۀ سوگیری تفسیر نیز تأیید شد، اما طی تحلیل‌عاملی تأییدی پنج مؤلفه حذف شد و شش مؤلفه با شاخص‌های برازش مطلوب باقی ماند؛ بنابراین، از آنجا که این پرسشنامه ابزاری قابل‌اعتماد و معتبر است، می‌تواند برای سنجش سوگیری‌های تفسیر افراد با تیپ شخصیتی دی به‌کار گرفته شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

تیپ شخصیتی دی

سوگیری تفسیر

مقیاس

عنوان مقاله English

Construction of Type D Personality Interpretation Biases Questionnaire and Its Psychometric Properties

نویسندگان English

Seyedeh Zahra Mousavi ¹

Ali Pakizeh ²

Sooran Rajabi ¹

Kerry John Rees ³

¹ Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran.

² Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran.

³ Department of Psychology, School of Natural and Social Sciences, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham, England.

چکیده English

The objective of the present study was to develop the type D personality interpretation bias questionnaire and evaluate its psychometric properties among college students. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were implemented in this investigation in accordance with the positivistic paradigm. The target population consisted of 277 students from the Persian Gulf University in Bushehr, selected using the probability cluster sampling method from December 2022 to February 2023 (157 female and 118 male). For measuring the variables, three questionnaires of type D personality (DS-14), well-being of Flourishing Scale (FS), and type D Personality Interpretation Biases (DIB) were used. The exploratory factor analysis was conducted using SPSS-26, while the confirmatory factor analysis was conducted using AMOS-24. In accordance with the exploratory analysis, 11 components were identified with an eigenvalue greater than 1. Each of the components contained a number of items with a factor burden greater than 0.5. The interpretation bias questionnaire’s convergent and discriminant validity, as well as Guttman reliability, were also verified. However, in the confirmatory factor analysis, five components were eliminated, and six components were retained with satisfactory fit indices. Consequently, this questionnaire is a valid and dependable instrument that can be employed by specialists to assess the interpretation biases of individuals with a type D personality.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Interpretation Bias

Scale

Type D Personality

زارعی فسخودی، ب.، کربلائی محمد میگونی، ا.، رضابخش، ح.، و قلیچی، ل. (1400). مقایسۀ اثربخشی درمان یکپارچۀ فراتشخیص اختلالات هیجانی و درمان فراتشخیص مبتنی بر کارآمدی هیجانی برکاهش نشانه‌های اضطراب بزرگسالان دارای لکنت زبان. پژوهش‌های کاربردی روانشناختی، 12(2)، 209-185. https://doi.org/10.22059/japr.2021.312232.643672

عظیمی، ح.، و سلیمانی، ا. (۱۳۹۹). مقایسه پریشانی روان‌شناختی، تکانش‌گری و تیپ شخصیتی D بین دانشجویان دارای نگرش مثبت و منفی به اعتیاد. اعتیادپژوهی، ۱۴(۵۷)، ۱۷۰-۱۵۱. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/etiadpajohi.14.57.151

علی اکبری دهکردی، م.، علی پور، ا.، عباسپور، پ.، سلیمی، ا.، و صفری، ی. ح. (۱۳۹۵). نقش میانجی بهزیستی روانی در رابطه بین باورهای فراشناختی و تیپ شخصیتی D با شدت علائم بیماری در بیماران مبتلا به پسوریازیس. مجله تحقیقات علوم رفتاری، ۱۴(۱)، 91-85. http://rbs.mui.ac.ir/article-1-453-fa.html.

لطفی، س.، کراسکیان موجمباری، آ. (1401). رابطۀ بین سبک‌های دلبستگی والدین و سبک‌های دلبستگی فرزندان: نقش واسطه‌ای تیپ شخصیتیD. مجله پرستاری کودکان، 9(1)، 89-99. http://jpen.ir/article-1-657-fa.html

مرادی سیاه افشادی، م.، قاسمی، ن.، و قمرانی، ا. (۱۳۹۴). روایی و پایایی مقیاس شکفتگی و تعیین رابطۀ شکفتگی با پیشرفت تحصیلی در دانشجویان دانشکدۀ پزشکی. مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی، ۱۵، ۳۳۷-۳۳۰. http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-3436-fa.html

موسوی، س. ز.، پاکیزه، ع.، و رجبی س. (1403). شناسایی سوگیری‌های شناختی تیپ شخصیتی دی: یک استراتژی پدیدار شناختی. علوم روانشناختی، 23(138)، 35-53. http://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-2239-fa.html

ولیخانی، ا.، و سرافراز، م. ر. (1395). روش تحقیق در روان‌شناسی. تهران: بینش نو.

References

Ali Akbari Dehkordi, M., Alipour, A., Abbaspour, P., Salimi, E., & Safari, Y. S. (2016). The Intervening Role of Psychological Well-Being in the Relationship of Meta-Cognitive Beliefs and Personality Type D with Severity of Illness Symptoms among Patients with Psoriasis. Journal of Research in Behavioral Sciences, 14(1), 85-91. http://rbs.mui.ac.ir/article-1-453-en.html. (In Persian)

Anglim, J., & O’Connor, P. (2019). Measurement and research using the big five, hexaco, and narrow traits: A primer for researchers and practitioners. Australian Journal of Psychology, 71(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12202

Azimi H, & Soleimani E. (2020). The comparison of psychological distress, impulsivity, and Type D personality between students with positive and negative attitudes toward addiction. Quarterly Journal of Research on Addiction, 14(57), 151-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/etiadpajohi.14.57.151 (In Persian)

Batik, M. V., & Demir, M. (2022). The mediating role of binge-watching in the relationship between type D personality and loneliness. Health Psychology Report, 10(3), 157-167. https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr.2021.109550

Beck, A. T., & Haigh, E. A. (2014). Advances in cognitive theory and therapy: The generic cognitive model. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153734

Bogie, B. J. M., Kapczinski, F. P., McCabe, R. E., McKinnon, M. C., & Frey, B. N. (2020). Emotional reactivity and explicit emotional memory biases in major depressive disorder during euthymia. Psychiatry Research, 285, 112847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112847

Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modelling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (3rd ed.). New York : Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757421

Chen, J., Short, M., & Kemps, E. (2020). Interpretation bias in social anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 276, 1119-1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.121

Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2023). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41, 745-783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y

Cho, K. H., Oh, K., Kim, S., & Kim, S. R. (2023). Relationships among symptoms, disability, type D personality, and quality of life in patients with migraine: A cross-sectional study in South Korea. Pain Management Nursing, 24(2), 180-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2022.08.001

Demir, S. (2022). Comparison of normality tests in terms of sample sizes under different skewness and Kurtosis coefficients. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(2), 397-409. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1101295

Denollet, J. (2005). DS14: Standard assessment of negative affectivity, social inhibition, and Type D personality. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000149256.81953.49

Denollet, J., Trompetter, H. R., & Kupper, N. (2021). A review and conceptual model of the association of Type D personality with suicide risk. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 138, 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.03.056

Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., … & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y

Dos Santos, P. (2021). Impacts of missing data in risk management. Doctoral dissertation, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne-Paris I. https://theses.hal.science/tel-03703684v1/file/DosSantos.pdf

Falkenstein, M. J., Kelley, K. N., Dattolico, D., … & Beard, C. (2022). Feasibility and acceptability of cognitive bias modification for interpretation as an adjunctive treatment for OCD and related disorders: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Behavior Therapy, 53(2), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2021.09.002

Gogheri, T., Samavi, S. A., & Najarpourian, S. (2023). Structural relationship model of type D personality and depression with the mediating role of cognitive distortions and family functioning in irritable bowel syndrome patients and healthy people: A multi-group analysis. Current Psychology, 42, 4103-4112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01755-y

Gokcen, N., Coskun Benlidayi, I., Tamam, L., … & Guzel, R. (2022). Type D personality and self-esteem in patients with fibromyalgia: A cross-sectional case–control study. Rheumatology International, 42, 1027-1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-022-05118-z

Grol, M., Schwenzfeier, A. K., Stricker, J., … & Fox, E. (2018). The worrying mind in control: An investigation of adaptive working memory training and cognitive bias modification in worry-prone individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 103, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2018.01.005

Howard, S., O’Riordan, A., & Nolan, M. (2018). Cognitive bias of interpretation in type D personality: Associations with physiological indices of arousal. Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback, 43, 193-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-018-9397-1

Khodabakhshi, M., Mirdrikvand, F., Abdollahi, M., & Mirshoja, M. S. (2016). Investigation of relationship between the type D personality and locus of control and predicting its addiction vulnerability. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(4 S1), 83. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n4S1p83

Kim, S. R., Nho, J. H., Kim, J. Y., & Hur, J. (2020). Effects of a lifestyle intervention based on type D personality in overweight and obese middle‐aged women: A feasibility study. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 17(5), 393-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12457

Lambertus, F., Herrmann-Lingen, C., Fritzsche, K., … & Albus, C. (2018). Prevalence of mental disorders among depressed coronary patients with and without type D personality. results of the multi-center SPIRR-CAD trial. General Hospital Psychiatry, 50, 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2017.10.001

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

Li, J., Wu, W., Li, N., Wang, J., Zu, L., & Ye, X. (2023). Predictive value of type D personality for cardiac events in Chinies patients with acute myocardial infarction. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 23, 556. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03598-w

Lodder, P., Kupper, N., Antens, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2021). A systematic review comparing two popular methods to assess a type D personality effect. General Hospital Psychiatry, 71, 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.04.002

Lodder, P., Kupper, N., Mols, F., Emons, W. H., & Wicherts, J. M. (2022). Assessing the temporal stability of psychological constructs: an illustration of type D personality, anxiety and depression. Journal of Research in Personality, 101, 104299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104299

Lotfi, S., & Kraskian Mujembari, A. (2022). The mediating role of type D personality in the relationship between attachment styles of parents and child. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 9(1), 89-99. http://jpen.ir/article-1-657-en.html (In Persian)

Lv, H., Tao, H., Wang, Y., … & Lin, P. (2020). Impact of type d personality on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the mediating role of cognitive appraisal and coping style. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 136, 110192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110192

Moradi Siahafshadi, M., Ghasemi, N., & Ghamarani, A. (2015). Evaluating the validity and reliability of flourishing scale and determining the relation between flourishing and academic achievement in students of medicine school. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 15, 330-337. http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-3436-en.html (In Persian)

Mousavi, S. Z., Pakizeh, A., & Rajabi, S. (2024). Identification of cognitive biases of type D personality: A phenomenology strategy. Journal of Psychological Science, 23(138), 35-53. http://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-2239-en.html (In Persian)

Nieto, I., & Vazquez, C. (2021). Disentangling the mediating role of modifying interpretation bias on emotional distress using a novel cognitive bias modification program. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 83, 102459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102459

Ogińska-Bulik, N., & Michalska, P. (2021). Type D personality in adolescents – the mediating role between depression and PTSD. Current Psychology. 40, 6145–6154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00935-6

Osborne, J. W., & Costello, A. B. (2004). Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 9(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.7275/ktzq-jq66

Park, Y. M., Kim, H. Y., Kim, J. Y., Kim, S. R., & Choe, Y. H. (2022). Relationship between type D personality, symptoms, cancer stigma, and quality of life among patients with lung cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 57, 102098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102098

Raines, E. M., Viana, A. G., Trent, E. S., … & Storch, E. A. (2019). Effortful control, interpretation biases, and child anxiety symptom severity in a sample of children with anxiety disorders. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 67, 102136. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.janxdis.2019.102136

Rychter, A., Miniszewska, J., & Góra-Tybor, J. (2023). Personality traits favourable for non-adherence to treatment in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia: Role of type A and D personality. BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 17, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-023-00261-w

Sarstedt, M., & Mooi, E. (2019). A concise guide to market research: The process, data, and methods using IBM SPSS statistics (3rd ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56707-4

Shrestha, N. (2021). Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1), 4-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.12691/ajams-9-1-2

Smith, H. L., Dillon, K. H., & Cougle, J. R. (2018). Modification of hostile interpretation bias in depression: A randomized controlled trial. Behavior Therapy, 49(2), 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2017.08.001

Tajii, K. (2018). Type D personality and attachment as predictors of heart rate variability during a cognitive and social stressor. Doctoral dissertation in psychology, the University of La Verne. https://researchworks.laverne.edu/esploro/outputs/doctoral/Type-D-Personality-and-Attachment-as/991004156256106311#details

Talaei-Khoei, M., Mohamadi, A., Fischerauer, S. F., Ring, D., & Vranceanu, A. M. (2018). Type D personality in patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal illness: Internal consistency, structural validity and relationship to pain interference. General Hospital Psychiatry, 50, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2017.09.005

Turton, R., Cardi, V., Treasure, J., & Hirsch, C. R. (2018). Modifying a negative interpretation bias for ambiguous social scenarios that depict the risk of rejection in women with anorexia nervosa. Journal of Affective Disorders, 227, 705-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.089

Unterrainer, J., Michal, M., Rahm, B., … & Beutel, M. E. (2016). Association of type D personality with cognitive functioning in individuals with and without cardiovascular disease. International Journal of Cardiology, 214, 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.03.221

Valikhani, A., & Sarafraz, M. R. (2016). Research methods in psychology. Tehran: Binesh-No. (In Persian).

Warne, R. T., & Larsen, R. (2014). Evaluating a proposed modification of the Guttman rule for determining the number of factors in an exploratory factor analysis. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 56(1), 104-123. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-19867-006

Woud, M. L. (2022). Interpretational biases in emotional psychopathology. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 29(3), 520-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2022.02.010

Yin, S., Li, N., & Wang, Y. (2023). Prognostic value of type D personality for post-stroke depression in ischemic stroke patients. Journal of Affective Disorders, 333, 172-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2023.04.064

Zareie Faskhudi, B., Karbalaee Mohammad Meigouni, A., Rezabakhsh, H., & Ghelichi, L. (2021). Comparison of the effect of unified transdiagnostic treatment from emotional disorders and emotion efficacy therapy on emotion regulation among adults with stuttering. Journal of Applied Psychological Research, 12(2), 185-209. https://doi.org/10.22059/japr.2021.312232.643672 (In Persian).