بررسی ویژگی های روانسنجی مقیاس رضایت مندی زوجیت در گروه معلمان متأهل زن شهر تهران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات

2 استادیار دانشگاه تهران

3 اﺳﺘﺎد ﮔﺮوه رواﻧﺸﻨﺎﺳﯽ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﯽ داﻧﺸﮕﺎه آزاد اﺳﻼﻣﯽ، واﺣﺪ ﺗﻬﺮان ﻣﺮﮐﺰی

4 استاد ﻣﻤﺘﺎز ﮔﺮوه رواﻧﺸﻨﺎﺳﯽ ﮐﻮدﮐﺎن اﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﯾﯽ داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﺗﻬﺮان

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش بررسی عملی بودن، اعتبار، روایی و نرم­یابی مقیاس رضایت­مندی زوجیت افروز بود. بدین منظور نمونه­ای به حجم 415 نفر از معلمان متاهل زن در مدارس راهنمایی و متوسطه شهر تهران که به روش نمونه­برداری تصادفی چند مرحله­ای انتخاب شدند (حجم نمونه با توجه به جدول کرجسی و مورگان)، پرسشنامه رضایت­مندی زوجیت (110 سوالی در طیف لیکرت 4 درجه­ای از کاملا موافقم تا کاملا مخالفم) را تکمیل کردند. نتایج نشان داد ضریب اعتبار پرسشنامه از طریق فرمول کلی آلفای کرونباخ 989/0 است. در بررسی روایی سازه از روش تحلیل عاملی استفاده شد. پس از حذف سوالات نامناسب و با استفاده از تحلیل مولفه­های اصلی، چرخش پروماکس، و ماتریس عاملی، نمودار شیب­دار و غیره از مجموعه 108 سوالی، تعداد 9 عامل استخراج شد. برای بررسی روایی همگرا، همبستگی بین دو مقیاس رضایت­مندی زوجیت افروز و رضایت­مندی زناشویی اینریج در سطح اطمینان 99/0،) 01/0P=) همبستگی 437/0 بدست آمد که نتایج نشان داد روایی همگرای مناسب بین دو ابزار فوق وجود دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Review on practicality reliability, validity and normalization of couple's satisfaction scale among married women teachers in Tehran city

نویسندگان [English]

  • Masoomeh Mohebbi 1
  • SOGAND GHASEMZADEH 2
  • Vali ollah Farzad 3
  • Gholam Ali Afrooz 4
2 عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه تهران
چکیده [English]

The current study aimed to observe the practicality, reliability, validity and norm finding of Afrooz couple's satisfaction scale. For this reason, a sample consisted of 415 guidance and middle schools teachers in Tehran city were selected by multi stages random sampling method then Afrooz marital satisfaction scale (110 item, based on likert's 4 point spectrum, fully agree to fully disagree) was administrated by the sample. The result of this study show that, reliability coefficient of this test obtained through Cronbach Alpha was equal to (0/989). In reviewing the structure reliability exploratory factor analyzing was used. After omitting unsuitable questions & by analyzing the main components, Promax rotation and so on, from set of 108 questions, 9 questions were extracted. In reviewing criterion reliability, the correlation of this scale by marital satisfaction of Enrich in confidence level of 99 percent (P=0/01) was obtained (0/437), and results show that, there is suitable convergent reliability between the two above tools.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • practically
  • reliability
  • Validity
  • Marital Satisfaction
  • married teachers
Afrooz Gh.(2010). Marriage And Glory Wife Psychology.Tehran University Press. [In Persian].
Afrooz Gh(2007). Top Hasbands Family Psychology.Tehran, Ollya Morrabian press. [In Persian].
Amanollahi A, Aslani Kh, Tashakor H, Avamesh S, Nekuei S. (1388). Women's Psychological Social Studies Quarterly. Review Of Relationship Between Love Romantic Attachment Styles And Marital Satisfaction, 3(10). [In Persian].
Sanaei B. (2001). The Masurement Scale Family And Marriage. Tehran Be'sat Press. [In Persian].
Soleimanian A. (1993). Review Of Irrational Thinking (The Cognitive Approch) On Marital Dissatisfaction. Thesis M.A, Kharazmi University. [In Persian].
Moosavi R, Farzad V. (1999). Comparison of the factors influencing marital satisfaction In Doctors, Employers And Workers Married Couple Group In Tehran. Thesis M.A. Family Reaserch Institute. [In Persian].
Hooman H. (1386). Psychological And Educational Measurement,Technic Preparation Of Test and questionnaire. [In Persian].
Yunesi Gh, Bahrami F. (2009). Prediction Of Deterministic Thinking And Marital Satisfaction In Couples. Iranian Psychologists Quarterly. Fifth Year, Number 14. [In Persian].
 Rajabi Gh. (2009). Factors Structure Of Marital Satisfaction Scale In Married Staff Iranian Journal Of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. Fifteenth Year Number 4. [In Persian].
Ghodrati M. (2009). Relationship between creativity and marital satisfaction Emong Parents of gifted students working In, non-profit and OrdineryTehran's Schools. PhD Thesis. Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch.[In Persian].
Gholizade Z, Barzegari L, Gharibi H, Babapur J. (2011). Relationship Between Clinical Psychology and Five Personality Factors NEO-FFI And Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Shahed University,1(43).[In Persian].
Vagheie Y, Miri M,Ghasemipur M (2012). Examine Factors Associated with Marital Satisfaction In Employees Of two Birjand Universities. Journal of Birjand University of Medical Sciences, (4) 16.
Golestani,E. Manzeri Tavakoli,A. Manzeri Tavakoli,H (2012).Relationship of Personality Traits with Marital satisfaction in Women. Journal Of Life Science and Biomedicine. 2(5): 216-218.
Kaslow, F & Robinson, J. A (1996) Long-term. Marriage: Perceptions of contributing factors. American Journal of Family Therapy,Olson D.H; McCubbin H.I.;Muxen M.J.;Larsen A.S. and Wilson M.A. (1989) . Families. California: Sage Publication Inc.
Sallivan, B & Swebel, A ( 1995). Relation ship beliefs and expectations of satisfaction in marital relationships. Journal of family therapy, 3, 278.306.
Sharaievska,I. Kim,J. Stodolska,M (2013). Leisure and Marital Satisfaction in Intercultural Marriages. Journal of Leisure Research. Vol 45, No 4.
Varma. Ved p (1990). The Management of children with Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties Routedge London.
 Parker, R.(2002) . How partner in longterm relationship view marrige. Family matters , Australian institute of family studies.
Zhang,H.Tsang,SKM.Chi,P.Cheung,YT.Zhang,X.Yip,PSF (2012). Wives' relative income and marital satisfaction among the urban Chinese population: Exploring some moderating effects.The Journal Of Comparative Family Studies, 2012, v. 43 n. 2, p. 185-199