ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی مقیاس هزینه؛ مؤلفه‌ای از نظریۀ انتظار - ارزش

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد روان‌شناسی‌تربیتی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران (نویسنده مسئول)

2 دانشیار گروه روان‌شناسی تربیتی و مشاوره، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

3 استادیار گروه روان‌شناسی تربیتی و مشاوره، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی ساختار عاملی، پایایی و روایی مقیاس هزینه (CS) انجام گرفته است. این مطالعۀ کاربردی، یک طرح روان‌سنجی است و جامعۀ آماری آن را دانش‌آموزان دختر پایه‌های دهم و یازدهم شهر کاشان در سال تحصیلی 1396-1395 تشکیل می‌دهند. از میان دانش‌آموزان دختر مدارس دولتی، 404 نفر به روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای چندمرحله‌ای انتخاب شدند و به مقیاس هزینه پاسخ دادند. روایی و پایایی، تحلیل‌عاملی اکتشافی و تأییدی با استفاده از نرم‌افزارهای SPSS و LISREL بررسی شد. نتایج تحلیل‌عاملی اکتشافی با روش مؤلفه‌های اصلی، سه عامل هزینۀ تلاش و هیجان تکلیف، هزینۀ تلاش بیرونی و نبود گزینه‌های جایگزین مهم را برای مقیاس هزینه تأیید کرد. برای بررسی پایایی پرسشنامه از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ و برای تعیین روایی آن از تحلیل‌عاملی استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد پرسشنامه از همسانی درونی قابل‌قبولی برخوردار است و ضرایب آلفای کرونباخ در زیرمقیاس‌های آن بیشتر از 9/0 است. مطابق نتایج تحلیل‌عاملی تأییدی، ساختار پرسشنامه برازش قابل‌قبولی با داده‌ها دارد و کلیۀ شاخص‌های نیکویی برازش، مدل را تأیید می‌کنند. یافته‌های تحلیل‌عاملی، تقریباً مشابه تحقیقات انجام‌گرفته در فرهنگ اصلی و ضرایب پایایی و روایی نیز به نتایج آن‌ها نزدیک است؛ بنابراین با توجه به خصوصیات روان‌سنجی مطلوب، این پرسشنامه ابزار مناسبی برای تعیین هزینۀ ادراک‌شده در دانش‌آموزان است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Psychometric Properties of the Cost Scale: A Component of Expected Value Theory

نویسندگان [English]

  • Motahhare Fattahi 1
  • Masoud Gholamali Lavasani 2
  • Zahra Naghsh 3
1 Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, Faculty of Education and psychology/ University of Tehran
2 Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, Faculty of Education and psychology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, Faculty of Education and psychology, University of Tehran
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study is to investigate the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the cost scale. This applied study adopted a psychometric design and its statistical population consisted of 10th and 11th grade female students in Kashan during the 2016–2017 school year. Among the female students in public schools, 404 were selected through a multistage cluster sampling method and answered the cost scale. Validity and reliability, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were evaluated using SPSS and LISREL software. The results of exploratory factor analysis by principal components method confirmed the three factors of task emotional and effort cost, outside effort cost and loss of estimated alternatives for cost scale. To investigate the reliability of the questionnaire, Cronbach’s alpha was used and factor analysis was employed to determine validity. In addition, results indicated that the questionnaire had acceptable internal consistency and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficients in the subscales are above 0.9. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the structure of the questionnaire had an acceptable fit with the data and all the indicators of goodness of fit confirmed the model. The results of the factor analysis were almost identical to those of the original culture and the reliability and validity coefficients were close to their results. Therefore, considering the desirable psychometric properties, this questionnaire is a suitable instrument for determining students’ perceived costs.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cost Scale
  • Factor Analysis
  • Psychometric
  • Expected Value Theory
پنتریچ، پ. ر.، و شانک، د. ه. (1394). انگیزش در تعلیم و تربیت: نظریه‌ها، تحقیقات و کاربردها.ترجمۀ مهرناز شهرآرای. تهران: نشر علم.
هومن، ح. (1395). مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری با کاربرد نرم‌افزار لیزرل (با اصلاحات). تهران: انتشارات سمت.
Battle, A., & Wigfield, A. (2003). College Women’s Value Orientations toward Family, Career, and Graduate School. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 62(1), 56–75.
Chen, A., & Liu, X. (2009). Task Values, Cost, and Choice Decisions in College Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 28, 192–213.
Chen, A., Zhu, X., Sun, H., & Ennis, C. (2012). Measurement Invariance of Expectancy-Value Questionnaire in Physical Education. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 16, 41–54.
Chiang, E. S., Byrd, S. P., & Molin, A. J. (2011). Children’s Perceived Cost for Exercise: Application of an Expectancy-Value Paradigm. Health Education & Behavior: TheOfficial Publication of the Society for Public Health Education. 38(2), 143–149.
Chittum, J. R., Jones, B. D., & Carter, D. M. (2019). A Person-Centered Investigation of Patterns in College Students' Perceptions of Motivation in a Course. Learning and Individual Differences. 69, 94–107.
Conley, A. M. (2012). Patterns of Motivation Beliefs: Combining Achievement Goal and Expectancy-Value Perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology. 104(1), 32–47.
Douglas, K. A., Merzdorf. H. E., Hicks, N. M., Sarfraz, M. I., & Bermel, P. (2020). Challenges to Assessing Motivation in MOOC Learners: An Application of an Argument-Based Approach. Computers & Education. 150, 103829.
Eccles, J. S. (1983). Expectancies, Values and Academic Behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and Achievement Motives: Psychological and Sociological Approaches, 75–146. San Francisco, CA: Free man.
Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective Task Value and the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement Related Choices. In A. S. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of Competence Andmotivation (pp. 105–121). New York: The Guildford Press.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals. Annual Review of Psychology. 53(1), 109–132.
 
Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to Succeed. Handbook of Child Psychology: Social, Emotional, and Personality Development. 3, 1017–1095.
Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, Values, and Academic Behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and Achievement Motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
Flake, J. K., Barron, K. E., Hulleman, C., MacCoach, B. D., & Welsh, M. E. (2015). Measuring Cost: The Forgotten Component of Expectancy-Value Theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 41, 232–244.
Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children’s Competence and Value Beliefs from Childhood through Adolescence Growth Trajectories in Two Male-Sex-Typed Domains. Developmental Psychology. 38, 519–533.
Gaspard, H., Häfner, I., Parrisius, C., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2017). Assessing Task Values in Five Subjects during Secondary School: Measurement Structure and Mean Level Differences across Grade Level, Gender, and Academic Subject. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 48, 67–84.
Hidi, S. & Harackiewicz, J. (2000). Motivating the Academically Unmotivated: A Critical Issue for the 21st Century. Review of Educational Research. 70, 151-179.
Hidi, S. & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development. Educational Psychologist. 41(2), 111–127.
Jiang, Y., Rosenzweig, E. Q., & Gaspard, H. (2018). An Expectancy-Value-Cost Approach in Predicting Adolescent Students’ Academic Motivation and Achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 54, 139–152.
Kim, M. H., Marulis, L. M., Grammer, J. K., Morrison, F. J. & Gehring, W. J. (2017). Motivational Processes from Expectancy–Value Theory are Associated with Variability in the Error Positivity in Young Children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 155, 32–47.
Kosovich, J. J., Flake, J. K., & Hulleman, C. S. (2017). Short-Term Motivation Trajectories: A Parallel Process Model of Expectancy-Value. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 49, 130–139.
Luttrell, V. R., Callen, B. W., Allen, C. S., Wood, M., Deeds, D. G., & Richard, D. C. S. (2010). The Mathematics Value Inventory for General Education Students: Development and Initial Validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 70, 142–160.
Perez, T., Cromley, J. G., & Kaplan, A. (2014). The Role of Identity Development, Values, and Costs in College STEM Retention. Journal of Educational Psychology. 106(1), 315–329.
 
Reindl, M., Tulis, M., & Dresel, M. (2020). Profiles of Emotional and Motivational Self-Regulation Following Errors: Associations with learning. Learning and Individual Differences. 77, 101806.
Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational Interest: A Review of the Literature and Directions for Future Research. Educational Psychology Review. 13(1), 23–52.
Trautwein, U., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., Ludtke, O., Nagy, G., & Jonkmann, K. (2012). Probing for the Multiplicative Term in Modern Expectancy–Value Theory: Alatent Interaction Modeling Study. Journal of Educational Psychology. 104, 763–777.
Watkinson, E. J., Dwyer, S. A., & Nielsen, A. B. (2005). Children Theorize about Reasons for Recess Engagement: Does Expectancy-Value Theory Apply? Adapted Physical ActivityQuarterly. 22, 179–197.
Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation: A Developmental Perspective. Educational Psychology Review. 6, 49–78.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The Development of Achievement Task Values: A Theoretical Analysis. Developmental Review. 12, 265–310.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 25, 68–81.
Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ Achievement Values, Goal Orientations, and Interest: Definitions, Development, and Relations to Achievement Outcomes. Developmental Review. 30(1), 1–35.
Wigfield, A., & Meece, J. (1988). Math Anxiety in Elementary and Secondary School Students. Journal of Educational Psychology. 80, 210–216.
Xiang, P., McBride, R. E., & Bruene, A. (2006). Fourth-Grade Students’ Motivational Changes in an Elementary Physical Education Running Program. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 77, 195–207.
دوره 12، شماره 1
خرداد 1400
صفحه 107-126
  • تاریخ دریافت: 25 اسفند 1398
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 14 خرداد 1399
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 24 خرداد 1399
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 25 اردیبهشت 1400
  • تاریخ انتشار: 01 خرداد 1400