بررسی ارزش تشخیصی فناوری ردیاب چشمی در سنجش سبک دلبستگی در بزرگسالان

عبداللهی ابراهیم آبادی, زهره; دهقانی آرانی, فاطمه; فراهانی, حجت الله; وهّابی, عبدالحسین

doi:10.22059/japr.2022.334520.644101

بررسی ارزش تشخیصی فناوری ردیاب چشمی در سنجش سبک دلبستگی در بزرگسالان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

¹ دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد روان‌شناسی بالینی، دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

² استادیار گروه روان شناسی، دانشکده روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

³ استادیار گروه روانشناسی،دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس،تهران،ایران

⁴ استادیار گروه هوش ماشین و رباتیک، پردیس دانشکده های فنی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

10.22059/japr.2022.334520.644101

چکیده

مطالعۀ حاضر با هدف بررسی ارزش تشخیصی ابزار ردیاب چشم در سنجش سبک دلبستگی بزرگسالان انجام شد. این مطالعه ارزش تشخیصی، مقطعی و از نوع مطالعات اولیۀ مشاهده‌ای-تحلیلی کمی بود. جامعۀ آماری این پژوهش شامل همۀ افراد 20 تا 45 ساله سالم و دارای تحصیلات دانشگاهی ساکن شهر تهران در سال 1400 بود. به این منظور، 44 بزرگسال 20 تا 45 ساله واجد ملاک‌های طرح به روش نمونه‌گیری دردسترس انتخاب شدند (زن= 36 نفر، مرد= 8 نفر). در مرحلۀ اول از پرسشنامۀ محقق‌ساخته و مقیاس تجدیدنظر شدۀ دلبستگی بزرگسال (R-AAS) به‌عنوان آزمون مرجع استفاده شد و افراد دارای معیارهای ورود انتخاب شدند. در مرحلۀ دوم به شرکت‌کنندگان تصاویر سیستم فرافکنانۀ دلبستگی بزرگسالان (AAP) به‌منزلۀ محرک برانگیزانندۀ سیستم دلبستگی به مدت 1 دقیقه و 39 ثانیه ارائه و هم‌زمان حرکات چشم آن‌ها از طریق دستگاه ردیابی چشم ثبت شد. به‌منظور تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها آزمون‌های جنگل تصادفی، رگرسیون لجستیک و منحنی راک در نرم‌افزار R ورژن آر استدیو 4.1.1 محاسبه شدند. متغیر «مدت‌زمان تا اولین تثبیت» در ناحیۀ مورد علاقۀ کودک در تصویر آمبولانس با ضریب B 95/1- و سطح معناداری 01/0 (05/0P ≤) قابلیت پیش‌بینی سبک دلبستگی ایمن و ناایمن را داشت. همچنین برای این متغیر درصد تشخیص صحیح افراد دلبستۀ ایمن 2/54 و در افراد دلبستۀ ناایمن 75 درصد برآورد شد. نتایج حاکی از قدرت تفکیکی متغیر «مدت‌زمان تا اولین تثبیت» در ناحیۀ مورد علاقۀ کودک در تصویر آمبولانس بود. پیشنهاد می‌شود در مطالعات آتی این متغیر و متغیرهای «طول مدت اولین تثبیت» و «تعداد تثبیت‌ها» که مطابق با نتایج آزمون جنگل تصادفی مهم بودند، بیشتر بررسی شدند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

20.1001.1.22518126.1401.13.2.13.3

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Eye Tracking Technology in the Assessment of Adult Attachment Style

نویسندگان [English]

Zohreh Abdollahi Ebrahimabadi ¹
Fateme Dehghani-Arani ²
Hojjatollah Farahani ³
Abdolhosein Vahhabi ⁴

¹ Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

² Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

³ Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

⁴ Department of Machine Intelligence and Robotics, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran,Iran.

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to examine the diagnostic value of eye tracking technology in measuring adult attachment style. This investigation of diagnostic accuracy was cross-sectional and was one of the primary observational and quantitative analysis studies. The population of interest for this study included all healthy adults aged 20-45 years with higher education living in Tehran in 2021. For this purpose, 44 adults aged 20 to 45 years who met the criteria of the project were selected by random sampling. Of these 44 individuals, 36 were women and 8 were men. This study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, a researcher-made questionnaire along with the revised Adult Attachment Scale (R-AAS) as a reference test was created in the Google Form environment, and individuals who met the inclusion criteria were selected and included in the study. In the second phase, participants were presented with one minute and 39 seconds of Adult Attachment Projective Picture System (AAP) images as an activator of attachment, and their eye movements were simultaneously recorded with an eye-tracking device. For statistical analysis, the random forest test, logical regression, and ROC curves were calculated in RStudio 4.1.1. The variable “time to first fixation” in the child’s AOI in the ambulatory image predicted secure and insecure attachment (B = -1.95, sig. 0.01, p≤ 0.05). The correct percentage for classifying securely and insecurely attached adults was estimated to be 54.2% and 75%, respectively. Since the variables “duration of first fixation” and “number of fixations” were important according to the results of the random forest test, it is suggested that they be further investigated in future studies.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Attachment
Eye Tracking
Diagnostic Accuracy

مراجع

برک، ل. (1395). روان‌شناسی رشد از لقاح تا کودکی. ترجمۀ یحیی سیدمحمدی. تهران: ارسباران.

بهزادی‌پور، س.، پاکدامن، ش.، و بشارت، م. ع. (1389). رابطۀ بین سبک‌های دلبستگی و نگرانی‌های مربوط به وزن در دختران نوجوان. مجلۀ علوم رفتاری. 4(1)، 76-69.

پاکدامن، ش. (1384). برجاماندگی اختلال واکنشی دلبستگی در نوجوانی. روان‌شناسان ایرانی. 1(3)، 192-185.

نیکوگفتار، م. (1392). نقش سبک دلبستگی و کانون کنترل سلامت بر رفتارهای خودمراقبتی بیماران مبتلا به دیابت. مجلۀ دیابت و متابولیسم ایران (مجلۀ دیابت و لیپید ایران)، 4(12)، 316-309.

Ahmad, R., & Hassan, S. A. (2014). Reliability analysis of the Revised Adult Attachment Scale (RAAS) instrument in the Malaysian context. Social Sciences, 77, 29098-29100.

Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1979 a). Attachment as related to mother-child interaction. In J. S.

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., & Waters, E. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Ainsworth, M. S. (1979 b). Infant–mother attachment. American Psychologist, 34(10), 932-937.

Allen, B. (2011). The use and abuse of attachment theory in clinical practice with maltreated children. Part I: diagnosis and assessment. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 12(1), 3-12.

Antoniadis, A., Lambert-Lacroix, S., & Poggi, J. M. (2021). Random forests for global sensitivity analysis: A selective review. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 206(C), 107312.

Atkinson, L., Leung, E., Goldberg, S., Benoit, D., Poulton, L., Myhal, N., ... & Kerr, S. (2009). Attachment and selective attention: Disorganization and emotional Stroop reaction time. Development and Psychopathology, 21(1), 99-126.

Biau, G., & Scornet, E. (2016). A random forest guided tour. Test, 25(2), 197-227.

Biro, S., Alink, L. R., Huffmeijer, R., Bakermans‐Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2015). Attachment and maternal sensitivity are related to infants’ monitoring of animated social interactions. Brain and Behavior, 5(12), e00410.

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss. Vol. 1: attachment, vol 2: separation, vol 3: loss. London: Hogarth Press.

Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Volume II: Separation, anxiety and anger. In Attachment and Loss: Volume II: Separation, Anxiety and Anger (pp. 1-429). London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.

Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and Loss. Vol. 3: Loss, Sadness and Depression. London: Hogarth Press and New York: Basic Books.

Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect. American journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52(4), 664-678.

Buchheim, A., Erk, S., & George, C. (2006). Measuring attachment representation in an fMRI environment: A pilot study in an fMRI Environment. Journal of Psychopathology, 39(3), 144-152.

Buchheim, A., George, C., Kächele, H., Erk, S., & Walter, H. (2006). Measuring adult attachment representation in an fMRI environment: Concepts and assessment. Psychopathology, 39(3), 136-143.

Ciechanowski, P., & Katon, W. J. (2006). The interpersonal experience of health care through the eyes of patients with diabetes. Social Science & Medicine, 63(12), 3067-3079.

Collins, N. L. (1996). Working models of attachment: Implications for explanation, emotion, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(4), 810-832.

Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 644-663.

Collins, N. L., Ford, M. B., Guichard, A. C., & Allard, L. M. (2006). Working models of attachment and attribution processes in intimate relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(2), 201-219.

Crowell, J., Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2008). Measures of individual differences in adolescent and adult attachment. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd Edition; pp. 599-634). New York: Guilford Press.

Dechant, M., Trimpl, S., Wolff, C., Mühlberger, A., & Shiban, Y. (2017). Potential of virtual reality as a diagnostic tool for social anxiety: A pilot study. Computers in Human Behavior, 76(C), 128–134.

Dewitte, M., Koster, E. H., De Houwer, J., & Buysse, A. (2007). Attentive processing of threat and adult attachment: A dot-probe study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(6), 1307-1317.

Diamond, L. M., Hicks, A. M., & Otter-Henderson, K. (2006). Physiological evidence for repressive coping among avoidantly attached adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(2), 205-229.

Ding, X., Yue, X., Zheng, R., Bi, C., Li, D., & Yao, G. (2019). Classifying major depression patients and healthy controls using EEG, eye tracking and galvanic skin response data. Journal of Affective Disorders, 251, 156-161.

Ditzen, B., Schmidt, S., Strauss, B., Nater, U. M., Ehlert, U., & Heinrichs, M. (2008). Adult attachment and social support interact to reduce psychological but not cortisol responses to stress. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 64(5), 479-486.

Doležal, J., & Fabian, V. (2015). Application of eye tracking in neuroscience. Clinical Neurophysiology, 126(3), e44.

Donovan, W. L., & Leavitt, L. A. (1985). Physiologic assessment of mother-infant attachment. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 24(1), 65-70.

Dykas, M., & Cassidy, J. (2011). Attachment and the processing of social information in adolescence. Attachment in Adolescence: Reflections and New Angles: New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development. 87(117).

Feeney, J. A., Noller, P., & Patty, J. (1993). Adolescents' interactions with the opposite sex: Influence of attachment style and gender. Journal of Adolescence, 16(2), 169-186.

George, C., & West, M. (2001). The development and preliminary validation of a new measure of adult attachment: The adult attachment projective. Attachment & Human Development, 3(1), 30-61.

George, C., & West, M. (2003). The adult attachment projective: Measuring individual differences in attachment security using projective methodology. In Hilsenroth, M. J & Segal, D. (Eds). Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment: Vol. 2. Personality assessment.M. Hersen (Editor-in-chief of volume series). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

George, C., & West, M. L. (2012). The adult attachment projective picture system: Attachment theory and assessment in adults. New York: Guilford Press.

Gullone, E., & Robinson, K. (2005). The inventory of parent and peer attachment—Revised (IPPA‐R) for children: A psychometric investigation. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy: An International Journal of Theory & Practice, 12(1), 67-79.

Harezlak, K., & Kasprowski, P. (2018). Application of eye tracking in medicine: A survey, research issues and challenges. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 65, 176-190.

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524.

Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & Van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. London: OUP Oxford.

Jia, Y., Cheng, G., Zhang, D., Ta, N., Xia, M., & Ding, F. (2017). Attachment avoidance is significantly related to attentional preference for infant faces: Evidence from eye movement data. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1), 1–10.

Kammermeier, M., Duran Perez, L., König, L., & Paulus, M. (2020). Attachment security and attention to facial emotional expressions in preschoolers: An eye‐tracking study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 38(2), 167-185.

Koster, E. H., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., Van Damme, S., & Wiersema, J. R. (2006). Components of attentional bias to threat in high trait anxiety: Facilitated engagement, impaired disengagement, and attentional avoidance. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(12), 1757-1771.

Kret, M. E., Roelofs, K., Stekelenburg, J., & de Gelder, B. (2013). Emotional signals from faces, bodies and scenes influence observers' face expressions, fixations and pupil-size. Frontiers i Human Neuroscience, 7, 810.

Labek, K., Viviani, R., Gizewski, E. R., Verius, M., & Buchheim, A. (2016). Neural correlates of the appraisal of attachment scenes in healthy controls and social cognition—an fMRI study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 345.

Laura, M., & Stefano, M. (2012). Gaze and eye-tracking solutions for psychological research. Cognitive Processing, 13(1), 261-265.

Liu, Z., Yang, Z., Gu, Y., Liu, H., & Wang, P. (2021). The effectiveness of eye tracking in the diagnosis of cognitive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plos One, 16(7), 1-16.

Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1990). Procedures for identifying infants as disorganized/disoriented during the Ainsworth strange situation. Attachment in the Preschool Years: Theory, Research, and Intervention, 1, 121-160.

Maunder, R. G., & Hunter, J. J. (2001). Attachment and psychosomatic medicine: Developmental contributions to stress and disease. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63(4), 556-567.

Maunder, R. G., Lancee, W. J., Nolan, R. P., Hunter, J. J., & Tannenbaum, D. W. (2006). The relationship of attachment insecurity to subjective stress and autonomic function during standardized acute stress in healthy adults. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 60(3), 283-290.

Meredith, P., Strong, J., & Feeney, J. A. (2006). Adult attachment, anxiety, and pain self-efficacy as predictors of pain intensity and disability. Pain. 123(1-2), 146-154.

Neuroscience, H., Gander, M., & Buchheim, A. (2015). Attachment classification, psychophysiology and frontal EEG asymmetry across the lifespan: A review. Front Human Neuroscience, 9(2), 1–16.

Peltola, M. J., Forssman, L., Puura, K., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Leppänen, J. M. (2015). Attention to faces expressing negative emotion at 7 months predicts attachment security at 14 months. Child Development, 86(5), 1321-1332.

Ravitz, P., Maunder, R., Hunter, J., Sthankiya, B., & Lancee, W. (2010). Adult attachment measures: A 25-year review. Journal of psychosomatic research, 69(4), 419-432.

Ray, A., Subramanian, A., Chhabra, H., Kommu, J. V. S., Venkatsubramanian, G., Srinath, S., ... & Philip, M. (2019). Eye movement tracking in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 43, 9-16.

Rognoni, E., Galati, D., Costa, T., & Crini, M. (2008). Relationship between adult attachment patterns, emotional experience and EEG frontal asymmetry. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(4), 909-920.

Roisman, G. I., Holland, A., Fortuna, K., Fraley, R. C., Clausell, E., & Clarke, A. (2007). The adult attachment interview and self-reports of attachment style: An empirical rapprochement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 678-697.

Rosenblatt., R. A. Hinde., C. Beer., & M. Busnel (Eds.), Advances in the Study of Behavior, 9,L-51. San Diego: Academic Press.

Schall, A., & Bergstrom, J. R. (2014). Introduction to eye tracking. In Eye tracking in user experience design (pp. 3-26). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

Schmidt, S., Nachtigall, C., Wuethrich-Martone, O., & Strauss, B. (2002). Attachment and coping with chronic disease. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 53(3), 763-773.

Shaver, P. R., Schachner, D. A., & Mikulincer, M. (2005). Attachment style, excessive reassurance seeking, relationship processes, and depression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 343-359.

Silva, C., Chaminade, T., David, D. F., Santos, A., Esteves, F., Soares, I., & Deruelle, C. (2015). Attachment style impacts behavior and early oculomotor response to positive, but not negative, pictures. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56(3), 327-334.

Spangler, G., & Grossmann, K. E. (1993). Biobehavioral organization in securely and insecurely attached infants. Child Development, 64(5), 1439-1450.

Szymanska, M., Monnin, J., Tio, G., Vidal, C., Girard, F., Galdon, L., ... & Vulliez-Coady, L. (2019). How do adolescents regulate distress according to attachment style? A combined eye-tracking and neurophysiological approach. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 89, 39-47.

Tarnowski, P., Kołodziej, M., Majkowski, A., & Rak, R. J. (2020). Eye-Tracking Analysis for Emotion Recognition. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2020(2909267), 1-13.

Teixeira, R. C. R., Ferreira, J. H. B. P., & Howat-Rodrigues, A. B. C. (2019). Collins and Read revised adult attachment scale (RAAS) validity evidences. Psico, 50(2), e29567.

Todd, J., Sharpe, L., Colagiuri, B., & Khatibi, A. (2016). The effect of threat on cognitive biases and pain outcomes: An eye‐tracking study. European Journal of Pain, 20(8), 1357-1368.

Vandevivere, E., Braet, C., Bosmans, G., Mueller, S. C., & De Raedt, R. (2014). Attachment and children’s biased attentional processing: Evidence for the exclusion of attachment-related information. Plos One, 9(7), e103476.

Waller, E., Scheidt, C. E., & Hartmann, A. (2004). Attachment representation and illness behavior in somatoform disorders. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 192(3), 200-209.

Wichmann, T., Buchheim, A., Menning, H., Schenk, I., George, C., & Pokorny, D. (2016). A reaction time experiment on adult attachment: The development of a measure for neurophysiological settings. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 548.

Yaseen, Z. S., Zhang, X., Muran, J. C., Winston, A., & Galynker, I. I. (2016). Comparison of brain activity correlating with self-report versus narrative attachment measures during conscious appraisal of an attachment figure. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 90.